6/10/2023 0 Comments Who created happy gameA game who’s opening warning screen makes sure to immediately tell you that, despite what the title says, it is not in any way a happy game. That is until Happy Game, Amanita’s most recent release. Their bread and butter is surreal, hand drawn imagery, but as far as I know they have never gone in the direction of taking their content into the realm of horror. Likewise, Amanita Design is not a new player in the adventure game scene, with a pedigree of releasing games like the Samorost trilogy, Machinarium, and Botanicula. “But for me and many other artists, it’s starting to look like a threat to our careers.The concept of taking something that is meant to be cute and heartwarming and twisting it into something disturbing and downright messed up is not exactly new we’ve seen it dozens of times with properties like Alice in Wonderland for example. For them, “it’s a cool experiment,” he says. Rutkowski says he doesn’t blame people who use his name as a prompt. Google also won a case against authors who objected to the company’s scraping their copyrighted works for Google Books. In the US, LinkedIn lost a case in an appeals court, which ruled last spring that scraping publicly available data from sources on the internet is not a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. “The risk, of course, is that rights holders simply refuse to make their works available, which would undermine the very reason for extending fair use in the AI development space in the first place,” says Dennis. The art community could end up moving into a pay-per-play or subscription model like the one used in the film and music industries. While artists and other rights holders would not be able to opt out of this regime, they will be able to choose where they make their works available. “It could also be a way in which creators or IP holders can assert ownership over media that belongs to them or synthesized media that's been created with something that belongs to them,” says Nina Schick, an expert on deepfakes and synthetic media. It could help fight disinformation as well as ensuring that digital creators get proper attribution. Some online art communities, such as Newgrounds, are already taking a stand and have explicitly banned AI-generated images.Īn industry initiative called Content Authenticity Initiative, which includes the likes of Adobe, Nikon, and the New York Times, are developing an open standard that would create a sort of watermark on digital content to prove its authenticity. They launched a site called Have I Been Trained, which lets artists search to see whether their work is among the 5.8 billion images in the data set that was used to train Stable Diffusion and Midjourney. LAION did not immediately respond to a request for comment.īerlin-based artists Holly Herndon and Mat Dryhurst are working on tools to help artists opt out of being in training data sets. Mason encourages any artists who don’t want their works in the data set to contact LAION, which is an independent entity from the startup. The group is in its early days of mobilization, which could involve pushing for new policies or regulation. “There is a coalition growing within artist industries to figure out how to tackle or mitigate this,” says Ortiz. But it’s also a lot more personal, Ortiz says, arguing that because art is so closely linked to a person, it could raise data protection and privacy problems. Karla Ortiz, an illustrator based in San Francisco who found her work in Stable Diffusion’s data set, has been raising awareness about the issues around AI art and copyright.Īrtists say they risk losing income as people start using AI-generated images based on copyrighted material for commercial purposes. Other artists besides Rutkowski have been surprised by the apparent popularity of their work in text-to-image generators-and some are now fighting back. Some artists may have been harmed in the process Stability.AI released the model into the wild for free and allows anyone to use it for commercial or noncommercial purposes, although Tom Mason, the chief technology officer of Stability.AI, says Stable Diffusion’s license agreement explicitly bans people from using the model or its derivatives in a way that breaks any laws or regulations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |